- Westwood Newcomers CoffeeWed, 12/03 10:00am
- Clapboardtree Nursery School Open HouseFri, 12/05 12:00pm
- Winterfest 2008Sat, 12/06 10:00am
Project Background/Update: Condominiums Still the Game Plan
I wanted to provide some background on one of the recent developments in the Westwood Station project. Before doing so, it's important to note that the economic climate surrounding the project has changed dramatically in the last few months. For us at CC&F, the debate between economists as to whether or not we have entered a recession, is an academic discussion. The financing markets have turned downward dramatically and lending conditions are very challenging. We are very fortunate in that our joint venture partner, Commonfund, is very strong financially and able to provide the project with substantial equity investment. We are also fortunate that our retail partner, Steve Karp of New England Development, have recruited many strong, high quality national retailers to the project. Nothwithstanding those strengths, the project still requires a considerable amount of construction financing and construction lenders have uniformly become more conservative, tightening both lending conditions and financing terms. The harsh markets have already caused the indefinite delay of several major projects in the region including North Point (Cambridge), Southfield (the redevelopment of Weymouth Naval Station), Columbus Center (Boston), and much of Fan Pier (only the office portion is proceeding).
Westwood Station's commitment to condominium development and sales of the residences remains unchanged. Otis & Ahearn is the broker/marketing agent and plans are underway for construction of an on-site marketing and sales office. All units are still to be designed and constructed to facilitate sale as condominiums. Condominium sales generate greater profits for the development than rentals (and so, of course, we strongly prefer to sell all units) but, given current market conditions, lenders will not provide financing on units that are exclusively restricted to condominium sale. The prior terms of the draft Development Agreement provided constraints on rental terms that lenders now will simply not accept in their financing. For example, one prior condition provided that no resident could renew any lease after two years (thereby forcing eviction of that individual). The intent was to provide us, the developer, with a further incentive to convert rentals to condos as rapidly as possible by making it more challenging to keep the units rented.
We are optimistic that Westwood Station will carve out a unique position in the greater Boston residential development market. It's worth noting, however, that virtually all major project financing now involves several national or international lenders, few of whom are based in Boston. A decade or so ago, a strong Boston project might be able to make a special appeal to Bank of Boston, or Bank of New England. Now, the major lending institutions are spread out around the globe and have little special affinity for a particular region. Our optimisim is appreciated, but not bankable, thus the change in rental conditions. Again, this does not change our business objectives. Condo sales remain easily the most preferrable way financially to bring residences to market. It's my belief that the unique mixed-use character and Westwood location of the project will very much do its part to help make this happen. What is less certain is what will happen to the national and regional economy and what impact that will have on condominium sales.
I hope this background is helpful and I am prepared to provide similar information on other aspects of the project or to answer specific questions if that is useful.
Jay Doherty
Cabot, Cabot & Forbes







Reply To Jay Doherty and Comments on Westwood Station
Thank you Jay for taking the time to read the town blog. What you wrote sounds wonderful and quite eloquent - just like you speak.
Jay - you fail to address any of the potential negative outcomes from having condos be rentals or from the project at all. Yes, you want them to be condos but we all know we don't always get what we want. What then? What happens to Westwood. I noticed the nice additional $4 M on top of the $2 M for the school system. I am sure most of the town will be thrilled with that. We are asking to spend $4M this year on modular classrooms for the middle school. $6M mitigation will be gone in the blink of an eye if these units are rentals. This town never addresses potential negative impacts either. I find that comical as most actions have both a positive and negative impact. But apparently not Westwood Station. I wish someone would be honest enough to address them and to do it publically.
You mention other projects that have stopped due to lack of funding. If you truly need funding, downsize.. downscale. That's what the trend is for most mixed use projects these days - downsizing not asking for condos to be rentals. Did you ever think if the project was smaller, it would be easier to finance??? I know if I had problems getting funding for my mortgage the town of Westwood would not do back handsprings to get me help that I needed.
For anyone reading both sides of the arguments please remember I am a resident of Westwood who has attended far too many meetings. I also have nothing to gain or lose from this. I am not an abutter. I am honest and will fight for my town. I have said nothing on this blog or at meetings which is not the truth. However, CCF will tell you what you want to hear and tie it up with a pretty bow. They are professionals at it. They have tons of lawyers who tell them what to say and how to say it. I think Jay is a nice man but I have heard him change his story numerous times. He is very convincing and charming. Please remember that when reading blog posts, newpaper articles etc.
Finally, Jay, could CCF take the time to update the community website like you have done to update this blog. The community website was promised to the residents to be a place to go for updates and information - a site for the residents. It is a PR tool for CCF and CCF only. It is rarely updated with important meetings and the news section is only news that is positive for CCF. I really am disappointed by it. It could be such a positive information center for us all. wscommunityonline.com. Maybe it will be updated since it has been mentioned here.
any regional comparisons?
Most talk I hear about mitigating damages casts the project as a kind of community trade-off. Maybe this is more a question for the architects, but are there any examples in the country of what you think a successful project of this type looks like? We are nowhere near the size of Tysons' Corner, VA or the Santana Row development in San Jose, CA, and perhaps unique because this project is the first of its size in a very low density town area, but, apart from the immediate money objectives, what's the long term vision?
Post new comment