Westwood Station Construction and Financing Update
On "value-engineering": Value engineering is the process of trying to produce construction with design that is more cost efficient. Its goal is NOT to reduce quality, but to produce the same quality at lesser cost or with a better result. For example, there are three approaches to building garages: cast-in-place concrete (the garage is fully cast at the site); a pre-cast garage where the major components are concrete cast off-site then trucked to the site and erected; and, "hybrid" garages which use combinations of steel and concrete. Different garage sizes and designs lend themselves to different costs. All sorts of factors affect the "best" garage design: the intended use (retail, office or residential parking); the size of the garage; tenant requirements; and, site and soil conditions. It may sound a little silly, but getting garages "right" is very important in many respects. Think about your own experience when you go somewhere and the garages can be confusing, scary and of poor quality construction. Lighting, signage, elevators, stairs, sight lines, and construction quality all need to be well thought out.
Pre-cast garages are often favored because of the more reliable quality control when you have the garage spans cast in a factory but there are only a few precast plants in the northeast (and a few in Canada). If several of these are busy, the cost of precast garages climbs quickly. On the other hand, cast-in-place garages depend on carpenters creating wooden forms on site to cast the garage members. If the carpenters are busy, then cast-in-place garages can escalate in cost. Cast-in-place and hybrid garages are also more demanding on general contractors, so you have to evaluate quality controls in the field closely.
As the economy changes, costs and availability changes. A year ago, concrete was rising in cost at a frightening clip, particularly as demand in China drove up cement and concrete costs. Earlier this year, gas costs made the shipping of large precast spans in the northeast much more expensive.
Therefore, you really have to stop and evaluate what will be the best product at the best price when you actually lock-in a contract. To get the right answer, you often have to engage the architect and structural engineers to test new designs so that the construction and price can be properly evaluated.
You can undergo a similar process on other building elements, including elevators, building skins, electrical systems and windows. The bad news about a bad economy is obvious, job losses, declining incomes, reduced state and local services. The good news is commodity and labor costs are lower so you can sometimes deliver the same or BETTER product for less cost.
On public funding and infrastructure. At present, Westwood Station has to provide over $120,000,000 of infrastructure and mitigation improvements. Of this amount, approximately $80,000,000 or more is PUBLIC infrastructure (largely major highway ramps and roads). Many of these road improvements were pledged by the state when the MBTA/Amtrak station was built but were never built. Significant portions of these pledged improvements have become the obligation of Westwood Station.
Also, some of the "private" infrastructure ($40,000,000 of the balance of the $120,000,000) includes investments most of us would think of as public. For example, we will spend millions to build or rebuild electrical service in the area (we build it, NStar owns it and receives all revenues). These "private" infrastructure investments also include public plazas, fire station and equipment, project roads, and public aquifer enhancements.
In addition, after two years of intense state evaluation that fully approved the project with this $120 M cost, the Town of Canton is insisting on $35,000,000 of additional public highway infrastructure. As you know, Canton has backed up their insistence by blocking Westwood's Home Rule Petition (Wegmans) in the state house.
The above amounts do NOT include $33,000,000 in planning and permitting costs that have been spent to date on the project.
We cannot identify any other private development project with anything remotely approaching this level of cost.
At present, there are NO PUBLIC FUNDS WHATSOEVER dedicated to this massive infrastructure and mitigation undertaking. As the financing markets have collapsed, commercial lenders are refusing to lend funds for public infrastructure. Therefore, if the state or federal government should choose to make available public funds to pay public infrastructure, it is likely that we will seek to secure such funds.
I do think it may help your readers to consider this: at this point in time, virtually all major pending construction projects in greater Boston have come to an unprecedented FULL STOP. If you see construction, it was construction that started several months ago. In other areas of the country, projects are now being arrested in mid-construction, in some cases with incomplete steel frames rising into the air. Usually, non-profits (hospitals, colleges, etc.) take advantage of times like these to get construction done at good prices. That is not the case today, where even Harvard with a $20 Billion endowment has announced a major curtailment of campus expansion. Hospitals are very uncertain of future donations and borrowing costs.
We are on the verge of one of the most massive curtailments in construction that this country has ever seen and its effects are only just beginning to be felt. Now, it is taking the form of major construction layoffs. Next, engineering and architectural firms will reduce staff. Law firms are also beginning to feel the chill.
Westwood Station is viable because of the deep investment commitment of its investor, Commonfund and its skillful retail partner, Steve Karp of New England Development. We are moving ahead on all fronts, design, permitting, leasing and construction. We expect and believe that certain obstacles, such as Canton's blockage of the Westwood Home Rule Petition, will end. But, yes, it may require creative approaches to areas such as the massive infrastructure investment.
We do believe and presume that there will be banks still standing and ready to lend over the next few months. Unfortunately, such a presumption can be readily called into question. A few months ago, Royal Bank of Scotland, Citizens' Bank's parent bank, one of the largest banks in the world, was thought to a significant financial entity. Today it is fully owned by the British government. Sovreign Bank is now a Spanish owned entity and our own government has become the owner of one of the world's largest insurers (AIG). No one, no one, knows what will happen next or how these and other banks will behave over the next several months.
I strongly believe that the Town of Westwood through all of its citizens and leaders, through its Selectmen and its Planning board, has, over the past four years of painstaking work, ensured a sound, healthy, vibrant new place to be created on the site of this old industrial park. The benefits of new infrastructure, new local and state tax revenues, construction jobs and permanent jobs, are very substantial, but fully realizing this project will remain challenging.
Comments
Westwood Station Random Comments for Mr. Doherty
Jay,
Thank you for taking the time to update this blog with the challenges facing Westwood Station. Many residents of Westwood and other towns have questioned the size of Westwood Station from the beginning and other challenges facing the project. We pleaded with CCF to downsize the size of this project and make it more of what we were promised initially at town meeting. We were ignored. I believe this process would have been easier if the project was smaller like initially discussed. The issuing of permits for example might have been a wee bit more timely than the process currently taking place. Our town volunteers are faced with permitting a massive project that keeps changing. However, I realize it is frustrating for the developer to go through this process as it is for a resident to go to meetings and sit through hours of talk about bike racks and toilet sizes.
While this process continues, the residents of Westwood are constantly asked to understand the changes that you are forced to make. One example is how the high end condo market quickly turned into rental properties. This completely changes the dynamics of the housing portion whether or not anyone will admit to that.
You mention the town of Canton holding up the development. Are we really supposed to think that this massive project is swinging back and forth on 1 LIQUOR LICENSE. Come on! If that is the case, Westwood is in for far bigger problems I fear.
Finally, while I appreciate you updating this site, the town should be updated more frequently on the town website with feedback from meetings and on the community website. The community website that we as neighbors were promised is a dusty website that is completely outdated. We do not need a professional website to be updated by a costly PR firm but a nice community blog maybe updated REGULARLY by a member of your team might be nice.
Thank you for taking the time to read my random thoughts.
Joanie M
clarification
Hi Joanie,
I agree with you that CC&F should use this forum more frequently to provide project updates. I would however like to quibble with you on one point.
It is unfair to mischaracterize Jay's statements. Jay never says or even implies that the town of Canton is holding up development. He says they are holding up the home rule petition as leverage to squeeze an additional $35 million in public highway infrastructure. This was supplied merely as an example of the public and private infrastructure costs being borne by the developer. Later, he states very clearly that development is moving forward "on all fronts".
2% for the roads
Since wwstation will add 50,000 cars a day to an already clogged 95/128 interchange, the town of Canton is entirely correct in demanding adequate infrastructure be in place.
For a $1.5 billion development, the $35 million for roads is only 2%. A small amount when taken in context of a mall the size of NatickMall or SouthShorePlaza being dropped onto 128 without having to provide its own flyover ramp. Wwstation is 7 times larger than Legacy Place (which seems to be proceeding quite well). Perhaps wwstation was just too big to succeed and is indeed collapsing upon itself.
Quibbling Points
To Blue Hill Drive Resident,
True -- Mr. Doherty did not in his blog post say that 1 liquor license was holding up the project. But he did refer to the home rule petition. Maybe it was wrong of me to address it in my blog entry but I did title it random thoughts and I have a lot of random thoughts on this development.
I am glad to see some new names on this blog as it is a Westwood Blog. I wish however you had some quibbling points on Mr. Doherty's blog entry as well and not just on your neighbor's points. I do not have a staff that helps me prepare my entries. While Mr. Doherty does not use the services of Shawna Sullivan's firm (the name escapes me now) you know that he had carefully thought about every sentence in his blog posting. I am sure if you read it again, you can find some parts of his blog entry to discuss here.
Joanie
More Westwood Station Info in local papers
Thank you Mr. Doherty for blogging on this site. We need to be more informed and hope you will continue to blog here and post information in Westwood local papers, etc.
Build it once Build it right or Build it smaller
Mr Doherty unlike other residents im not going to thank you for bloging to this site.
I beleive the reason your bloging to the site is purely selfish. You are trying to gain our support in building a project with less funds. I like your examples of pre fab garages. Let me ask you a question how many pre fab houses are in Westwood. The bottom line is you have to cut cost to lure Investors. Time and time again one thing is promised and another is delivered. Mr Doherty your a developer and the only reason your company is building Westwood Station is to make a profit. BUILD IT ONCE BUILD IT RIGHT or build it smaller.
Thank you!!
Mr. Doherty,
I work on University Ave. and I think what you and team are doing with University Ave. and Westwood Station is terrific. You're taking a totally run down area and building a community from the ground up. Pretty cool. The area needs the development that you're doing whether the residents think they do or not.
Forget about ridiculous things like people accusing you of only wanting profit. The area needs fresh development like this. A struggling economy needs this - it needs a project to endure the tough economic times. Plain and simple.
It will be a place that is good for young and old alike. Kids will be safe there. Those that work in the office space can attract talent and will have a place to build team camaraderie. It will be a destination. Some place to visit with the family, go to after work, or visit on a Saturday. It'll be a nice place to take a walk at lunch or with a date.
Has anyone heard of Blue Back Square in West Hartford, Connecticut? www.bluebacksquare.com - I grew up in the area and after much fighting by those in the town, Blue Back Square revolutionized the town center. It's fantastic and virtually everyone loves it. I imagine Westwood Station will be much of the same.
Please keep these entries going! It's the only thing to entertain us on University Ave. until the project is complete! In all seriousness, though, they are incredibly helpful and encouraging. I can't wait to see how you progress.
Blue Black Square Would Be Ideal Here!
In response to IworkonUniversity...
Blue Black Square looks amazing. IT is what Westwood was initially promised for University Ave. Who wouldn't want Blue Black Square instead of a run down Warehouse row? Residents in CT were concerned with traffic and that is there right. However, Blue Black Square is 550,000 square ft. of development. That would be perfect. There are 59 condos and 48 rental units. Again, perfect for University Ave and this town. The concerns of residents would be minimal as traffic, impact on schools, crime would all be within reason. However, Westwood Station at full build will be 4.5 MILLION SQUARE FT. Even if only Phase I is built, that is 1.5 MILLION SQUARE FEET of Retail and 495 condo/rental units. Don't you think that gives residents are right to question this development and hope for some small changes? I do. We all want a wonderful development there and a place where people can go to enjoy life. Maybe Mr. Doherty could give us Blue Black Square. Sounds perfect.
Smaller shops, quick eateries, etc.
I wonder why we have not yet heard much about the smaller eateries, small shops, etc. that will be a part of the development as well? Those are what will give the project a community feel...Patriot Place, for example, seems to be struggling with filling those in their space, so it may be beneficial to hear where they are on that front.
Probably safe to say we can rule out any of them that will be at Legacy Place in Dedham. But then again - a Best Buy is planned for WW Station according to that Globe article from a few weeks back...And there is one in Dedham also. Thoughts?